AMNY
City Council members on Monday voiced
several concerns over Mayor Eric Adams’ sweeping “City of Yes” zoning
amendment designed to make it easier for Big Apple businesses to operate
and expand.
Legislators grilled Department of City Planning (DCP) officials over certain components of the 18-point plan, known as the “City of Yes for Economic Opportunity,” during a Monday hearing. The proceeding followed the City Planning Commission’s (CPC) approving the measure last month.
Dan Garodnick, who serves as both DCP
commissioner and CPC chair, said the proposal is aimed at modernizing
zoning rules that were written over 60 years ago, which he described as
“too complex, restricted and outdated.” It seeks to fill the nearly
17,000 storefronts across the five boroughs, while allowing businesses
to open and expand into spaces where they are not currently permitted.
“It will help revitalize commercial
corridors, fill vacant storefronts and boost our economic recovery
across the board,” the mayor said at a rally preceding the hearing.
Bronx City Council Member Kevin
Riley, chair of the council’s Zoning and Franchises Subcommittee, said
he is concerned the plan does not address the concentration of “last mile”
large package distribution warehouses — utilized by e-commerce
companies like Amazon — in some corners of the city. The problem is
particularly acute in areas like Red Hook, Brooklyn, and Hunts Point in
the Bronx, Riley said.
“The city needs to rethink
comprehensively how packages are being delivered to our homes and the
concentration of large packaging warehouses in certain neighborhoods,”
Riley said.
The council member also raised the
alarm about the city Department of Buildings’ (DOB) ability to enforce
the rule changes with its current resources and staffing levels.
“The Department of Buildings does not
have the needed staff or resources to address violations of the zoning
resolution,” he added. “The administration needs to pledge to increase
DOB’s resources so that our quality of life concerns that our
communities are rightfully raising are fully addressed.”
The plan would allow “clean
manufacturing” — like 3-D printers and jewelry makers — to operate in
commercial districts, make it so more businesses can operate on upper
floors of buildings and authorize new corner businesses like bodegas to
open in residential zones. Additionally, the changes would clear the way
for life sciences labs to open near hospitals and allow for activities
like dancing that are currently barred in some commercial zones.
Council Member Alexa Aviles
(D-Brooklyn) who represents Red Hook, said there was a “full omission”
of proposals to address the concentration of last mile facilities in the
plan.
“We know the climate impacts, the
polluting impacts, the thousands of additional diesel trucks in our
community and yet no portion of this has addressed that in earnest,”
Aviles said, referring to the pollution from trucks picking up packages
from the facilities.
Garodnick said regulating the
facilities is a “challenging topic,” but noted that zoning changes might
not be the best way to address what is partially a transportation
issue.
“We can certainly commit to turning
over all land use possibilities [and] working with our partners at the
city and state,” he said. “You have my commitment to continue to work
with you on that.”
City Hall spokesperson William Fowler later insisted, in a statement,
that adding a requirement for companies to seek a “special permit” for
citing last-mile warehouses, as Aviles seeks to do, would be out of the
legal scope of the plan.
“While we urge the City Council to adopt ‘City of Yes for Economic
Opportunity’ as we continue to craft policy for last-mile warehouses and
logistics in New York City more broadly, a special permit is not
legally allowed to be added to the proposal,” Fowler said.
In a separate line of questioning,
Council Member Lynn Schulmann (D-Queens), asked how DOB will manage
enforcing the zoning changes with limited staff and resources. Garodnick
insisted that the zoning changes will actually lighten the workload for
DOB enforcers by “clarifying” the rules.
“This proposal is designed to make it
easier for them to read, respond to and enforce the rules that we’re
putting on the books,” Garodnick said.